Shouldn't some of these AI company higher ups be arrested and brought up on Computer Fraud and Abuse charges?

Any individual running a local LLM that hacked a company would absolutely be held responsible for the LLM's actions, and corporations are, as Mitt Romney likes to say, people.

▲

jpfromlondon a day ago | parent | next [-]

it's fiction, that's why.

▲

dormento 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Seems like nowadays the mantra is:

- "Hey dev, why did you write bugged code?"

- "It wasn't me, it was my LLM"

- "Hey ops guy, why did you deploy and insecure env?"

- "It wasn't me, it was my LLM"

- "Hey dude why did you hack this firm?"

- "It wasn't me, it was my LLM"

ad infinitum.

▲

ActionHank a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"I have a girlfriend, but she goes to another school so you won't know her, but she's real!"

▲

cyanydeez a day ago | parent | prev [-]

which part, CEOs being arrested for illegal activities?

	▲	inigyou 20 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The hacking is fiction. Every AI company is claiming this happened to get a stock boost.

▲

iAMkenough 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If there isn’t a legal resolution, that’ll only leave us with a Luigi resolution.

▲

scotty79 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> Any individual running a local LLM that hacked a company would absolutely be held responsible for the LLM's actions

What if he could present evidence that he didn't tell AI to do it? Is it reckless negligence to give any AI agent access to the internet or even not prevent it 100% from gaining it? Because millions are doing it daily. Pretty much everybody who's doing anything with AI agents.