I wonder why they didn't compare with GPT-5.6-sol, only Terra?

wmf an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Clearly they're positioning it as a mid model.

	▲	minimaxir an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Which is in itself a bit weird as mid models nowadays are a golden mean fallacy. Terra is much less popular than both Luna (cost-sensitive) and Sol (performance-sensitive). Claude Sonnet is a weird exception to the mid models because Anthropic doesn't do much with Haiku and Opus is too big.
	▲	redox99 16 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		But why include Opus then?

woadwarrior01 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Haven't you seen the kernel optimization case study at the bottom of the page? They compare against GPT-5.6 Sol and their model is worse.

logicchains an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Presumably because it's worse than Sol, same reason they compared it to Opus 5 not Fable.

Handy-Man an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Their bigger model is not ready - watermelon code name was still being prepared for release as of a month ago