| ▲ | NoDodgeQuestion an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zed should focus on basics. When it focuses on basics Zed is good. https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/discussions/54150 failing to show newly created files and declining to provide a refresh button, instead adding a polling backend, breaks Zed on WSL. Why a new version control system? Why not git, jj, or another existing system? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ibejoeb 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I agree with you that I wish they'd just nail the editor. I've been using it for years now and I really like it, but there are a few rough parts (settings and LSPs especially) that could probably be tuned up in no time if the focus was there. Having said that, I love the idea of correlating the agent sessions to the changes. I'm glad someone is working on it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | manmal an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Their ACP integration is good (finally), at least with Codex. For when I want to be near the code, I prefer it now over TUIs or the Codex app. It feels much more immediate that way. Sticking to the basics will kill them IMO. They have been pitching themselves as agent-native for a while btw. And the workflow they are describing in the post sounds amazing, I‘ve been wishing for that. It‘s orthogonal to CVS, no? You can still make PRs. But, crucially, you can loop people in early on, when it matters the most. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alfalfasprout 28 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you even read the post? The idea is to tie conversations to code. This is a more sophisticated version of something like doltdb, not a git replacement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||