| ▲ | cogman10 7 hours ago | |||||||
> They don't need probable cause to search his vehicle if he had a warrant. Incorrect. Warrants have to be specific. An arrest warrant is not a general search warrant (in fact, general search warrants aren't legal). You don't lose your rights because a cop is arresting you. Now, what can happen (and probably would happen) is the cops can take a drug sniffing dog to the car when it goes to impound and while the owner isn't there and claim "Oh, the dog signaled on the car so we searched it". | ||||||||
| ▲ | c22 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It's called an "Inventory Search": https://www.fletc.gov/sites/default/files/imported_files/tra... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jimt1234 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Cops have used the "odor of marijuana" for years as probable cause to search vehicles. AFAIK the courts have generally supported it. | ||||||||
| ||||||||