More than one thing can be true. Flying into the side of a mountain is an error by the pilot (obviously). It can also be true that if GPS wasn't being jammed it wouldn't have happened.

▲

wat10000 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

“If X was different then Y wouldn’t have happened” is a useless way to evaluate things that leads one to blame a butterfly flapping its wings for causing a hurricane.

▲

gpm 12 minutes ago | parent [-]

Not useless if you can identify and stop the butterflies that cause hurricanes.

	▲	wat10000 5 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The point is that they don’t cause hurricanes, despite the fact that some hurricanes might not have happened if not for the flapping. I can point to at least one fatal crash that wouldn’t have happened if GPS was unavailable. Would it be reasonable to say that crash was caused by a lack of GPS jamming?