From the patterns I have seen people would tend to use the time to build demo's using AI instead of design and then have a back and forth on the demo itself. One has to consider the fact that demo's look more convincing/complete and give an impression that the design decision has been made. In some ways, how agile got rid of the need for explicit & detailed documentation, the AI created demo's will cut the requirements of high level designs too.

▲

Exoristos 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> demo's look more convincing/complete ...

In the case of an LLM generated demo, usually deceptively so.

> and give an impression that the design decision has been made.

In the case of a vibed design, this is the opposite of useful for the team.

	▲	sandeepkd 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The concept of MVP has been there for a while, it felt deceptive too and incurred lot of tech debt. However one would feel the deception only if they understand the missing details. For a lot of roles making decisions it benefits them to ignore the details unless it really bites them