> I, as the human, still have to do the thinking as Claude still 'can't jump'

I still have to do quite a bit of thinking but the amount of of thinking I do per task is trending down. I agree LLMs are not good at abduction but very few humans are either and very few jobs/tasks require it. I can't talk for researchers jobs though. But perhaps fewer researchers would be desired by these labs (not none).

▲

bigfishrunning 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> I still have to do quite a bit of thinking but the amount of of thinking I do per task is trending down

Don't worry, I'm sure you'll hit your goal of zero thinking soon!

▲

xprnio 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Trending towards the Homo Amens Mechanicus: the mechanical thoughtless human. What a goal

	▲	germandiago an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Only bc of this I will keep balancing what I do with my brain with what machines can do. dangerous outcome. The IQ willl drop if we just become mechanical acritical people the same way muscles get worse if you do not exercise.

▲

champagnepapi 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

jihadjihad 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I agree LLMs are not good at abduction but very few humans are either

I, too, am glad that few humans seem good at abduction.

	▲	selljamhere 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And I hope LLMs don't get better at it.

▲

fhub 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Abduction" being the way the article used it as in "explanatory reasoning in justifying hypotheses". https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/