| ▲ | amazingamazing 36 minutes ago | |
Suppose LLM solved all math problems. So what? It’s not like diplomacy and war will end. Are humanity’s problems really constrained on our intellectual ability? If anything most evidence points to cultural failing and all AI will do is enable unprecedented oppression due to said skills at intellectual tasks. As you read this some poor person is starving. Humanity already possesses the ability to identify said person and send them aid. How is AI going to help here? The ultimate fallacy is that all technological progress will benefit mankind. That will be true until it is not. | ||
| ▲ | drcode 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
I have no idea if diplomacy and/or war will end, I just hope we humans get to hang around a few more years | ||
| ▲ | ChadNauseam 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It's an interesting time when the bar has moved to "It’s not like diplomacy and war will end". But that is on the table. Nuclear weapons caused the end of wars as we know them. Great powers no longer directly attack each other. And AI is much more powerful than nuclear weapons, with an equal capacity for damage and a much greater capacity for good. By the way, I donate monthly to GiveWell and the shrimp welfare project. Do you donate monthly to starving people? Most people don't, and the reason is simple: at the end of the day, most people just don't care that much about helping a starving person far away. They also don't care much about things like that, animals in factory farms, or earthquakes that kill hundreds of thousands. But ideally, we could find a way to empower people such that the minority who do care can make a big difference. | ||