| ▲ | claudetard 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
This is good technical content, but it's obvious that an AI wrote it. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nextaccountic 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I actually came to the comments to share this snippet > The hot operation isn’t really “fold this character,” it’s “does this character fold?” Almost always no. Really that's distracting. If you must use LLMs, also do a rewrite pass that removes most LLMisms | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Groxx an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yea, it's terse and clipped in some sentences, and then changes tone abruptly and randomly, and paragraphs really don't flow together at all. It feels awkward to read, and there is a lot more to read here than there needs to be... | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | agency 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Agreed. This is genuinely interesting content, but there is no doubt in my mind that "The two operations diverge on real characters—ß, İ, final sigma—which is why lowercasing as a stand-in silently produces wrong matches." is LLM output. Are we doomed to spend the rest of our professional and personal lives reading AI output? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||