| ▲ | sandeepkd 20 hours ago | |
> anti-poaching The term make it sounds like a good thing, however I do not know if this was really a net positive. It might have helped the companies but isn't this anti-competitive at the employee level? | ||
| ▲ | skeeter2020 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
It was mass-collusion between big companies to prevent people from exercising labour mobility. Poaching is illegal, i.e. theft from an individual or the crown; we shouldn't encourage treating people like company property. | ||
| ▲ | adastra22 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yes and they got in huge trouble for it. It was a massive scandal. The only reason Apple wasn’t made an example of was because all the other big companies followed suit and did the same thing. It was Steve Jobs that drove this monopolistic behavior that could have turned out much worse for Apple. | ||
| ▲ | beambot 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
yes, which is why Apple got massively fined for doing it -- nowhere near enough to compensate all the depressed engineering salaries though. | ||