I think the central finding in EA is donating money while earning good is better than donating time directly for charity. To me it seems correct but controversial for many people(likely because you are maximizing your personal income)

▲

JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent [-]

> the central finding in EA is donating money while earning good is better than donating time directly for charity

EA has many tenets, some of make sense per se, but collectively–particulalry when taking into account that EA isn't just an idea but a movement of people with a distinct culture and track record–probably do more harm than good.

▲

YetAnotherNick an hour ago | parent [-]

What doesn't make sense? I thought expected wealth optimization was the most controversial thing by far.

	▲	JumpCrisscross an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> What doesn't make sense? Well, for one, the frequency of its members committing mass fraud. Like, if a church preaches kindness and love but its preachers and members are constantly out there murdering people, it's a bit silly to point to the text alone when evaluating the organisation.