| ▲ | mholm 20 hours ago | |||||||
> He reported returns of 439% for the first half of 2026 > which posted a loss of 67% in July So it's still up 44% this year? The article notes this, but seems unnecessarily adversarial against an investor who is still wildly successful. | ||||||||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 20 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> it's still up 44% this year? Devil is in the details of what Citadel paid for its positions, whether there are any performance tails/clawbacks, how and when the GP charges fees, et cetera. Aschenbrenner is almost certainly up. I'd be surprised if his median LP is breaking even. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ymolodtsov 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
From everything I read it seems that they're only up on the Anthropic stock and that doesn't account for newer clients who invested later. | ||||||||
| ▲ | flowerthoughts 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The same goes for all reporting on YouTube. Many publishers jumpers the gun without looking at context. It's also interesting that Citadel is mentioned everywhere as the buyer, as if it's strange that a huge market maker firm would be involved in a large forced sale. Seems the fund also has Anthropic shares, so it's not like their entire portfolio got margin called. | ||||||||
| ||||||||