> an informal term for the embrace of strange or scientifically unsound ideas by some Nobel Prize winners, usually later in life. It has been argued that the effect results, in part, from a tendency for Nobel winners to feel empowered by the award to speak on topics outside their specific area of expertise

Sounds pretty much like every founder out there who strike gold once in the past now believing their genius now clearly applies to everything everywhere, including country governance, economics and sociology. It probably doesn't help that others around them are affected in similar ways and become more sycophantic because of the "award" these two types of people win.

A lot of that comes from becoming incredibly rich then adopting morals and policy preferences that align with that level of wealth inequality

Angela Collier has a terrific video about this : billionaires want you to know they could have done physics.

I thought this was how Nobel Prizes sickened fields.

Mathematicians believe we're lucky to have been spared the Nobel Prize. While some repeat a discredited story this was because Gösta Mittag-Leffler was sleeping with Nobel's wife, it is generally felt that mixing ego and the possibility of a Nobel Prize has toxic effects on a field.

We now have both the Fields Medal and the Abel Prize, but both pass over the midlife period when ego eclipses talent.