| ▲ | msephton 3 hours ago | |||||||
Am I understanding correctly that around 1997 a single person transcribed 42 hours of recordings? Wild and impressive. I wonder how long it took them? Modern tools would likely do it in 42 minutes? | ||||||||
| ▲ | jubilanti an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
At max, two full work weeks for a lightly trained amateur to transcribe 42 hours of decent but not great quality audio. A professional could do it in near realtime. For me, it is notable that this is notable for you. This used to be as ubiquitous of a profession in modern organizations as typists were. Many people's entire job was going to meetings and/or listening to calls, transcribing the conversation, not just taking notes. Professional stenographers transcribe in realtime with phonetic markers and everything. Even lightly trained transcriptionists can transcribe 1 hour of audio in 1.25-1.5 hours of wall clock time. For an amateur, you could probably get to a 1:2 ratio within a few hours. It's at max two full weeks of work. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | The-Bus 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Even if the transcription was instantaneous, you'd still need to manually vet it, i.e. listen to all of it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | lordleft 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
While 42 minutes would be hard to beat, I think that stenography was and remains a highly mature and impressive skillset. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I'm transcribing more than 42 hours of meetings and designs into software code; work is work. It's tedious and repetitive maybe but there's always people really into that kind of thing. | ||||||||
| ▲ | detourdog 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
That’s what foundations are for. Transcription used to be a human job just like computers. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | amelius 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Maybe those modern tools could be used to clean up the audio and video? | ||||||||