| ▲ | walrus01 3 hours ago | |
In approx. 2000 to 2002, 2003 or around then, there was a theoretical dream that Itanium based workstations would become a real mass market thing, but it obviously never caught on. Intel never made Itanium CPUs cheap enough to realistically purchase and Itanium motherboards never became a thing from the top-10 sized Taiwanese motherboard makers (the same companies that were making really nice boards for the 1 GHz to 1.2 GHz socketed Pentium 3 with 512KB cache and the first generations of Pentium 4). Also the performance sucked. This was before AMD64 existed on the corporate desktop or home desktop. | ||
| ▲ | bobmcnamara an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
It totally worked! Took out like four decent risc competitors with just a little FOMO | ||
| ▲ | MisterTea an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> Itanium motherboards never became a thing from the top-10 sized Taiwanese motherboard makers Supermicro and pretty sure Tyan offered Itanium motherboards. From what I remember the Itanium was always harped on as too complex and too power hungry for mainstream while offering abysmal x86 emulation which soured its adoption. It had a niche in certain industries like HPC and high reliability. AMD's x64 architecture launched only 2 years after Itanium launched and pretty much destroyed any future for Itanium. | ||
| ▲ | acdha 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yeah, that was real soon now in the mid-90s – I remember reading Byte in high school and they’d be talking about how Alpha, MIPS, etc. workstations were doomed and then it kept getting pushed back – maybe 98/99, early in the next century, … and then AMD launched x86-64 and everyone just stopped pretending Itanium was ever going to happen. | ||