Remix.run Logo
just_some_user a day ago

The actual interesting part about such an attack is not that something is down, but rather why someone would run it. A lot of DDoS originates from script kiddies, but such attacks are usually very short lived as attacks are expensive. So which actor would actually benefit from downing the Norwegian government?

sixtyj 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is not expensive, unfortunately :(

Flare + BleepingComputer 2026, Kaspersky, StormWall, and others show that the DDoS-as-a-service market is highly commoditized and prices are extremely low:

A short test / basic attack on a website: $5–25.

Daily attack on a poorly protected target: around $100/day.

A more robust or well-protected target: $200–500 per day.

Monthly subscription to booter/stresser services: often $15–40 (sometimes even less); premium packages cost hundreds of dollars.

Larger or longer-term campaigns or infrastructure: thousands of dollars.

On the governmental level these money are almost nothing if you want to hurt someone else…

Retr0id a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

DDoS tends to be monetised as DDoS-as-a-service. Taking down "significant" services is good advertising. Either that, or they plan to extort the Norwegian government.

just_some_user a day ago | parent [-]

But for such a "proof of power" a short attack which takes the service down once is enough, long attacks are not so common and actually require some work from the attacker

Retr0id a day ago | parent | next [-]

If the attack doesn't last long, bystanders can't know whether it was trivially mitigated by the victim.

A shorter attack won't make as many news headlines, either.

devin a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Unless part of the social proof is that mitigation is more difficult.

giwook a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Probably a country that lost to Norway in the World Cup.

roflmaostc a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

is there actually any source those attacks are really done by "script kiddies"?

More likely this more politically motivated and backed up by money and more capable groups

red-iron-pine 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

i don't think script kiddies are a thing anymore.

AI kiddies, more likely. in some ways script kiddies weren't a thing for a decade or more as the attack surface got considerably harder to penetrate, and the model changed for pay-to-play attacks. AI simply caused the bottom of that market to fall further, and effectiveness to increase.

just_some_user a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, thats what I meant

InTheArena a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What do they benefit from taking down any government, NGO or civic work program? American systems, as well as larger European systems are constantly attacked. I've seen the same traffic. Fire walling off China, North Korea and smaller eastern European countries is a must if you ever plan to expose any internet exposed services.

red-iron-pine 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> So which actor would actually benefit from downing the Norwegian government?

do we really need to ask?

clearly it's the Danes

cantalopes a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Imo russia most likely

red-iron-pine 10 hours ago | parent [-]

almost certainly. they're hitting all NATO governments, and Norway is a direct competitor in the arctic.

esseph a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It hasn't been majorly like that in twenty years.

Botnets are services now, a business. They gain customers by their effectiveness and resilience.

For $$50-100 you can deny service to a lot of big sites and services.

inigyou a day ago | parent [-]

I've seen people say this but no proof of it. Could I really take down Stack Overflow for $50? Oh wait, it took itself down for free.

thesh4d0w 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Trivial to google and find, for example https://overload.st/

cynicalsecurity a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Really, you have no one in mind? Someone who is sending hundreds of bombing drones daily to Ukraine, killing civilian population, women and children, and who is eager to send a message to NATO countries any way possible?

motbus3 a day ago | parent | next [-]

That is much less effective than every other manner they tested on the past few years such as shadow fleets, ghost satellites etc.

Up to the moment it has not been the operation adopted which would make it weird.

On who would do it then, anyone who benefits from instability. From corporations trying to sell flocked uped sytems, politicians, etc.

There is one south american country who was attacked exactly this way before their head of the government was kidnapped.

cynicalsecurity a day ago | parent [-]

You don't understand Kremlin's mentality. Any even little nasty thing they can do to the West makes them giggle like Doctor Evil. "Oh, a NATO country's government infra was not protected from DDoS? Let's have fun, haha!" You are dealing with story book villains. I know, this sounds so ridiculous it's hard to believe someone can actually be like this. But then the reality check hits.

throwaway742 a day ago | parent | next [-]

They aren't story book villains. I think this says a lot about your mentality.

throwuxiytayq 19 hours ago | parent [-]

Story book villains usually have better justification for their evil acts than the Russian government.

cindyllm a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

inigyou 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is Israel supplying drones to Ukraine? Good on them.

inigyou a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

iwontberude a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

those script kiddies control botnets in foreign countries and use them to attack stuff just bc. its not their compute, so no marginal cost to them

aaron695 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

tuatoru a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The UK. It wants to steal Norway's vast stores of electricity.

Crunchified a day ago | parent [-]

"vast stores of electricity"?

QuantumNomad_ a day ago | parent [-]

Electricity production in Norway is predominantly hydroelectric.

When it rains dams fill up. The water is drained into shafts with turbines, and electricity is generated.

However, even though we are big on hydroelectricity percentage wise I’m not sure it’s all that vast an amount of electricity on a global scale. We are a pretty small country after all.

According to Wikipedia, the Norwegian electricity sector had 40.26 GW installed capacity as of 2021 and was producing 157.113 TWh in the same year. [1]

Great Britain had 74.8 GW installed capacity in 2023 and was producing 292.7 TWh in 2023. [2]

France was producing 537.7 TWh in 2020. [3]

Germany was producing 488.5 TWh in 2024. [4]

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Norway

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_in_Great_Britain

[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_France

[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Germany

Crunchified a day ago | parent [-]

It stored energy. It's not stored electricity.