Been doing it for the past several weeks. It is no longer correct to say that LLMs can't/don't/won't exercise reasonable aesthetic judgement on the finished product. Immense progress in this area has been made recently.

If you want the model to maintain a certain look and feel, or to preserve the UX in other ways, tell it. Even if it doesn't get it 100% right today, the direction of progress is pretty clear, so you might as well get used to prompting the models accordingly.

▲

20k 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This doesn't appear to relate to the conversation at all, because we aren't talking about generating entire products. Is this just generic AI advertising?

	▲	CamperBob2 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I'm responding specifically to the GP's point: 'And no, "Check that the software works as intended" is not going to cut it, as AI are very, very good at obeying the letter but not the spirit of the ask,' and specifically to your rejoinder ('I suspect the people advocating for this don't actually do this.') This is simply not the case when working with Fable-class models. Those who persist in believing it are hopefully very close to retirement. I'm not 'advocating' anything, just stating a fact.