| ▲ | tantalor 9 hours ago | |
> causes no ordinary harm to those nearby I don't see what's the big deal. If it causes no harm, why have any regulation? | ||
| ▲ | rogerb 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
It states that it causes no ordinary harm, implying it causes extra ordinary harm, I.e. incredible harm. | ||
| ▲ | dredmorbius an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
That's not half wrong. | ||
| ▲ | numb7rs 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Think of a merchant trying to convince you that "this is no ordinary watch". That sort of "no ordinary". | ||