How would 100% non-human code possibly be safer?

well if driving is supposedly safer when automated, why not code

dd8601fn 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

The qualities of computation that make autopilots safer than human drivers aren’t the same qualities that produce better designed software products.

	▲	micromacrofoot 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		to err is human

ModernMech 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s supposedly safer than the average driver, not safer than professional drivers.

	▲	micromacrofoot 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		the average american spends 60 minutes a day driving, that's thousands of hours by the time you reach 25... at what point is that not a professional level of experience?

Is it actually safer? If you can't understand the code you can't verify it's safety, and AI code often has bugs in it. You can't trust implicitly.

	▲	skeledrew 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You don't need to understand code to verify its safety if you have a good QA framework.
	▲	micromacrofoot 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Same applies to driving cars