> Flock themselves mis-translated the plate, plain and simple, and should not be being used in production for alerting authorities on very serious matters.

I am anti-Flock to the point that my friends and family roll their eyes when the topic comes up, but saying that because the image recognition software did not achieve 100% accuracy it can't be used under any circumstances is just silly.

I agree Flock shouldn't be used (I'd love to see the company bankrupt, the investors lose their money, and the founders imprisoned), but the accuracy of their software has nothing to do with why.

▲ m463 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It wasn't accuracy, it was recognizing the type of plate. It was a weird plate.

  34 <small 10> DTM
    manufacturer

here's the article with pictures:

https://www.thedrive.com/news/how-flock-cameras-wrongly-trac...

	▲	98codes 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Weird to us, but it's not as if it's not well known to (in this case) the state of NJ, nor is there an infinite set of license plate designs, particularly for the actual letter/number size, shape, and coloring.

▲ buttercraft 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Flock’s AI tech wasn’t registering that non-standard little number when it began picking up the Range Rover around town"

That sure sounds like an accuracy issue to me!

	▲	pc86 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> But when the police report was created and the plate was entered into Flock’s system, it was just recorded as 34 DTM. The license plate is 34 DTM. How would this have turned out any differently if a cop had run the plate behind this car at a traffic light?