Remix.run Logo
scrapcode 4 hours ago

> as much as I dislike Flock, it seems like it wasn't at fault here.

34DTM != 34DTM10

general1465 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But 34DTM* == 34DTM10 which is exactly what Flock did.

voxic11 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> The New Jersey plates that were allegedly stolen from the LA dealer were 34 03 DTM, not 34 10 DTM. But when the police report was created and the plate was entered into Flock’s system, it was just recorded as 34 DTM. Just the five large characters, no little number in the middle. And Flock’s AI tech wasn’t registering that non-standard little number when it began picking up the Range Rover around town. It just saw 34 DTM in large type and started alerting the local police.

No, it wasn't looking for partial matches, it was looking for an exact match of "34 DTM" and it missed the "10" in the middle of the victims plate because it was in non-standard small lettering (as required by law for those types of plates in their state). To be clear, the 10 was in the middle of the victims plate number, which was "34 10 DTM", not the end of it.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/how-flock-cameras-wrongly-trac...

pc86 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No license plate matching system required full, exact matches to return any hits. That has nothing to do with Flock.

buttercraft 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The incident would not have happened without Flock misreading the small numbers in the middle of the plate as it tracked them around town.