The article is exactly what you think it's going to be: "China is moving ahead, but at what cost?" and the usual breathless Sinophobia that comes with it. At the very least when this happened in the early 80s with Japan's "oh shit they're going to outdo us technologically!!!" we got really cool fiction out of it for the next two decades.

▲

ToucanLoucan 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The mass media loves to talk about ANYTHING besides the ongoing decay of the west, largely facilitated by it's own ineptitude at the game it designed. We're losing because we outsourced everything for short term gains and have let supercorps run completely without oversight, buying each other left and right, until every "American" product left is owned by one of four conglomorates, and none of them know what they actually do anymore and the only way they can keep "growing" is by cutting costs to the bone.

▲

kibwen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Surely you realize that this article is, in fact, about the ongoing decay of the West.

▲

throw-the-towel 6 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not. It's about what's going well in China, not what went wrong in the West.

▲

ToucanLoucan 6 hours ago | parent [-]

*with the implied framing being that China has somehow done this and is responsible, letting those actually responsible, largely the same people who own corpo rags like the New Yorker, off the hook entirely.

I refuse to believe this is a coincidence.

	▲	kibwen 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No, it's clear that you haven't actually read the article. You appear to be laboring under a sort of delusion, which I advise you to do your best to remedy.

▲

dominotw 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

yea history always repeats in patterns and nothing new ever happens.

	▲	aerodexis 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It is utterly fascinating the ends to which people will go to insist the opposite.