On one hand: impressive. On the other hands aesthetically it all looks painfully bland and generic.

I agree. But is that the model or the prompt?

I remember reading a report where people running AI-model instagram account were using insanely long and detailed prompts about the setting, lighting, makeup, pose, disposition, clothing, etc. about their models. Presumably with some reference image of the face / body to remain consistent across images.

It‘s not clear to me whether a sufficiently detailed prompt can generate actually interesting video with a natural ”texture” (for lack of a better word).

▲

razster 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That would be the prompt. With the right assistance from Qwen3.5/Ornith I was able to achieve some amazing results. Unfortunately due to their licensing I'm not allowed to use it in the USA, so I had to halt testing.

	▲	iamcoder18 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

fwip 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, even the demo prompts on the ComfyUI page aren't adhered to by the model. From the first prompt, one of the four lines:

> TRANSITION: a violent WHIP PAN off the rooftop that SMEARS the floating words away with it, motion-streaked —

And the video just didn't do any of that transition at all, it just replaced it with a cut. If you look at the rest of the prompts, you'll find similar lines that are just totally ignored. Except maybe the mouse one, I didn't see anything wrong with that off the bat.

▲

SV_BubbleTime 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This, today, is the absolute worse this model will ever be. Chill.