| ▲ | MisterTea 31 minutes ago | |
Plan 9 is mostly Rob Pikes idea and did not involve Ritchie heavily. https://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/1st_edition/designing_plan_9 Recently, Pike commented that he designed Plan 9 so he could build the windowing system he wanted. (edit: oops, link) https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T4fec171fec7e3845-M2... | ||
| ▲ | pram 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
That XTerm readme is pretty funny "Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here" | ||
| ▲ | lproven 11 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I knew this about Pike, but not Ritchie. Thanks. I think, though, that one of the vastly underestimated aspects of Plan 9/9front is its simplified C. AIUI one of the biggest differences is that a file is not allowed to `#include` anything that has already been #included in a parent project. You are not allowed to nest #includes. The result is vastly reduced compile times. I have read claims of over 1000x fewer lines of code going through the compiler. (Sure, disk caching helps a lot, but it still has to go through CPU.) Cleaning up a codebase is a massive PITA but it's a one-time job and I have read comments that once you learn this, it quickly becomes habit. Imagine if that was put into C29 as an advisory. Decades and centuries of compute-time saved. This is standard in Go, which is of course Pike's more recent baby. ANSI C let you get away with this, which sounds like one of the more epic mistakes: | ||