| ▲ | roger_ 7 hours ago |
| Seeing a lot of these “run 1TB models with 1GB RAM” projects recently. Most seem vibe coded and probably won’t be maintained. Hoping a winner emerges with some real momentum behind it. |
|
| ▲ | mkagenius 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| I love how goal posts are shifting from "vibe coded apps dont really work" to "vide coded projects wont be maintained" |
|
| ▲ | hiramwen 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You don't really need a maintainer when codex or claude code can set it up for you; thats how I got Trellis2 working on windows and tiny VRAM despite Microsoft recommending you have 24GB VRAM and Linux. Models are pretty disposable now. |
| |
| ▲ | tecleandor 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So, instead of having one or two maintained projects that work super well, now we have hundreds or thousands of people half-assing it locally each time they need it? Doesn't sound efficient. | | |
| ▲ | IAmGraydon 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It might make sense to do this if there literally isn't an existing solution out there, but I think most would find that it's better to use an existing solution than to recreate the wheel every time there's a need. It's just less effort/time/money. | |
| ▲ | esafak 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I have the same objection to forking open source projects; changes should be upstreamed when possible. |
| |
| ▲ | titularcomment 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is complete dependency on LLM tools all the way from development to usage, and is risky as well as prone to failure | | |
| ▲ | hiramwen 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Local inference without access to internet and tools is pretty safe, worst you get is a slop output, best case it solves your prompt. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | akie 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No no, don't just say "vibe coded", say "Fable and $500 of credits" |
| |
| ▲ | ricardobayes an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Or Deepseek with a fiver. | |
| ▲ | Foobar8568 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Opus 4.6 was already enough to tackle these projects vibe coding. | | |
| ▲ | gwerbin 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Incidentally I think I was more productive with Opus 4.6 than with any subsequent Anthropic model. | | |
| ▲ | cute_boi an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yea, opus 4.6 is much better than opus 5 because it is willing to do task. Opus 5 just gaslights and refuses to solve many complex problem. |
|
| |
| ▲ | cyanydeez 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | these things can be done with local models; so don't say 500$ credits, say "accelerated climate change disasters by $500/year" | |
| ▲ | Lalabadie 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "This one is made with premium vibes" |
|
|
| ▲ | classified 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| How a patchwork of Python modules constitutes an API(?) or whatever(?) and how to use it (does anyone?), is beyond me. There is nothing that I would call documentation, let alone concrete usage examples. I know more amusing ways to waste my time. When I want to play with models, I use llama.cpp. |