| ▲ | foft 2 hours ago | |
The question is what is reasonable. This is more how I work for code and I just tried for a document. i) Prompt (Human input) ii) Response (LLM) iii) For (i=0;i!=n;++i) { iv) Review/adjust (Human input) v) Response (LLM(s) - different perspectives) } vi) Rewrite parts that failed/I am not happy with (Human input). vii) Optionally repeat from iii. This tends to get me somewhere I want. For code at least. I made a document with it recently (fairly concise) and still worried I'd missed some AI slop in it. Though there is always human slop if I just made it by myself. | ||