| ▲ | whywhywhywhy 3 hours ago | |
I get it’s annoying and I personally hate it but firing someone for it is ridiculous. Are you expecting everyone to rewrite everything from an AI before they share it because that doesn’t sound a good use of company time either. | ||
| ▲ | ungreased0675 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
I think that’s not an unreasonable expectation. Don’t share raw LLM output with other people. | ||
| ▲ | jasonkester 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
No. I’m expecting everyone to answer direct questions that they are the only one who can answer by thinking up the answer with their own brain then writing or speaking that. | ||
| ▲ | californical an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It’s just a fancy version of previous tools. Imagine a coworker instead does a refactor by grepping the entire codebase and doing a find-and-replace. Do they ensure that it didn’t accidentally overwrite something it shouldn’t have? Or do they just throw up a PR and assume their little refactoring bash command works fine, then expect their coworkers to debug it for them? | ||
| ▲ | carlosjobim 12 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Firing somebody for it is ridiculous? If you say that, then you are also obliged as a customer to keep giving your money to companies who do not perform as expected. You have no right to choose a different lawyer if your lawyer makes an AI-generated report for your case. You have no right to walk past a restaurant which is using AI-generated billboards, you shall eat there. | ||