> Maybe that part of the article needs further editing?

Yes, I should edit it. I had not though about the bulk download until another user on Mastodon suggested it to me.

> Also, if the data of your tool is now available under ODbL, then the tasks related to importing it into OSM can be effectively performed by anyone, not necessarily you.

Definitely. I would be more than glad if libraries which are not on OSM were added back, I just don't have the required spare time to go through all the process and also maintain it.