| ▲ | bob1029 33 minutes ago | ||||||||||||||||
It was embarrassing a year+ ago when much of this technology barely worked at all. If you did not perceive a step change in model capabilities in late 2025, it's possible you are working on problems that are just too hard or not well aligned (e.g., arts and crafts). If you are working on software and need to move the occasional mountain, it's really hard to argue with the capabilities of contemporary models and harnesses. This space is evolving rapidly. Faster in some areas than others, but you should still keep an open mind and adapt to the new realities as they emerge. Wishing for a thing to fail can blind you to more opportunities than you would probably be willing to reject if they were presented directly. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | UpsideDownRide 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Sure it's better. 100x productivity is pure nonsense and there are other claims of this order. Rejecting exaggerated claims doesn't mean that someone is not seeing any value. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | xeonax 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Nov'25-Dec-25 something changed. I believe that was the time when Opus 4.5 was launched. (we went from function auto-complete to module auto-complete) People came from the vacations, and were like, make AI do your work. One could actually start offloading work to LLMs. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | LaGrange 13 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
OK Claude. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | asdfsa32 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yeah, this is nonsense. No one is arguing that AI is useless, but that there is a coordinated marketing campaign hyping it up. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hansmayer 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[dead] | |||||||||||||||||