Remix.run Logo
randomImmigrant 3 hours ago

Made some updates to my post but glad you brought up simulation: today when we simulate the brain, at whatever resolution, we do so in digital systems that have the Von Neumann bottleneck. Processing and memory are separated. In humans and all of biology, these things overlap instead. And that’s where simulations ultimately fail. They are out of step with real time in a way biology is not, because biology is attuned to the environment, and down to the molecular level, is actually enacting a physical process distributed across many cells that track the periodicities in various external signals, then anticipate them.

defrost an hour ago | parent [-]

Does Danny Hillis' Connection Machine have a von Neumann bottleneck? Do transputer arrays separate processing and memory?

When custom silicon is made to speed up LLM behaviour doesn't that operate fully parallel with mixed memory and processing?

When real time remote sensing signal processing pipelines are built isn't it possible to parallel in the kinds of filters that "anticipate" the expected future (and highlight deviations from the expected).

randomImmigrant an hour ago | parent [-]

Yes... when these things are done, we can talk. Which is why I said "I believe machines could be made that think". They can be. We just haven't done it yet.

defrost an hour ago | parent [-]

> Yes.

To which question?

The Connection Machine CM-2 (1987) has a non von Neumann architecture and mixes memory and processing .. so that's been done, 40 years ago.

Anticipating the future in real time remote sensing signal processing pipelines has been about for at least [redacted] decades.