Remix.run Logo
what 4 hours ago

Define “doing business”. If no money is exchanged, how are you “doing business” with them?

dredmorbius 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

From another California regulation (requiring telemarketers to register and secure a bond):

A seller is deemed to be doing business in the state if the seller solicits prospective purchasers from locations in California or solicits prospective purchasers who are located in this state.'

<https://oag.ca.gov/consumers/general/telreg>

The DROP act creates a right to California residents. To the extent I've read the statute, it doesn't define what entities are covered (see: <https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.x...>), which seems to me to suggest that affected entities are defined by their data collection from California residents, not where or how they engage in activities otherwise in California.

braiamp 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Doing business is doing business, money isn't necessary to "do business". If you hold any interest and that person has any relationship with you in a way that can be inferred that a contract is implied, then that's business. That's why travel to get an "agreement" is considered a business expense, even if the agreement never materialize.

what 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> doing business is doing business

That’s not much of a definition.

vvbull 24 minutes ago | parent [-]

You'd hate practicing law.

connicpu 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you've collected data on a California resident with the intent to profit from its sale then you're doing some type of business with respect to California

edmundsauto 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I’m not sure the definition matters here. Either you are doing business and this regulation makes certain things now illegal; or you are not doing business and it’s unsolicited and spam.