Fully LLM-written article, maybe that's another reason :)

jburbank 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I highly doubt that. What tells do you see that lends to probability of it being llm generated content?

Is it possible that we (myself included) have become conditioned to think content is llm generated as the default opinion?

	▲	asdf88990 12 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The article is definitely write or at least rewritten or heavily editorialised by an LLM. You can confirm this by skimming the author’s previous articles and compare it to this one, specially pre-2021.
	▲	Tiberium 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Come on, the LLM language is all over the article: > The workflow I had in mind was deliberately cautious > The code was not the difficult part. > These requirements are not a one-time form to complete and forget. They create an ongoing responsibility around the account, the documented process, community feedback, failures, and potential reversions. Just a few examples. And yes, Pangram 4 also flags it as 100% LLM written. I don't mind being downvoted or flagged, but I think more people should be aware of the LLM style, even if they're ok with it being used without any disclaimer. It's honestly sad that nowadays people on HN cannot recognize this style.
	▲	phoronixrly 12 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The way the text flows, the section headings that have zero creativity...

Demiurge 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]