| ▲ | dyauspitr 15 hours ago |
| No AI is a tool. It’s like you saying they didn’t say you can’t use oil paint. |
|
| ▲ | BobbyTables2 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Oil paint would be a bit more controversial if it painted the picture all by itself… |
| |
| ▲ | furyofantares 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're right, for example photography was controversial. | | |
| ▲ | DrewADesign 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | And photography is something where the image determines whether or not it’s art. If you are constructing an image using form, shape, light, subjects, tool selection, and all sorts of other factors to translate a 3D scene into a 2D image, revealing your particular perspective, then that is art, and pretty difficult at that. If you take a flat, objective, documentary picture of a painting, that’s not art. If you take a picture of something at the store you’d like to research later, that’s not art. If you’re telling someone, with your words, maybe some sketches and marked-up iterations what you want the picture to look like but they actually take it and finish it, you’re not the artist— you’re commissioning art. | | |
| ▲ | pkaeding 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Is taping a banana to the wall art? | | |
| ▲ | ChoGGi 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As much as a can of soup is. | |
| ▲ | DrewADesign 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As a performance maybe? Frankly I don’t give a flying fuck about how those rich kids entertain themselves. It’s like a jobs program for creative kids from big moneyed families. It has no bearing on what happens in the rest of the art world and it could not matter less when considering how credit and attribution work in commercial art. | |
| ▲ | dyauspitr 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It depends. Personally, the banana taped to the wall, doesn’t do anything for me, but I once saw a canvas with just three slightly raised simple curved ridges in an interesting pattern, all in white. It was very simple and could probably be done in under 20 minutes, but it was very compelling. | |
| ▲ | intended 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If this is what I think it’s referring to, then Yes. In the same way that a refutation of a previously stated position is part of an argument. Repeating that refutation verbatim, while calling it your intellectual work does not actually make it so. It shows, at best, your ability to remember things. |
|
| |
| ▲ | ChoGGi 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sure, but you can't tell your photograph to make another one, or steal a soul. That's what AI is for. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | userbinator 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Exactly. This was ultimately the work of a human who used AI to create something. |
| |
| ▲ | teeray 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | Just like the incredible pizza I made when I picked up my phone and said to it “one large supreme”, and there it was at my door, 30 minutes later. I really love how good the stuffed crust I made came out. /s |
|
|
| ▲ | kazinator 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can't speak to oil paint in English and get a picture. Until recently, the only such a "tool" used to be a human being. |
|
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There's no creativity or skill in handing something off to a generative model. At best, it's analogous to commissioning a work (as another poster said). It's not remotely like using a tool to create art. |
| |
| ▲ | satvikpendem 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | People who say this must not really know just how much work goes into crafting the image via something like ComfyUI workflows, which is where the actual skill and creativity is. Now I don't know if this poster was that or whether it was just a single ChatGPT prompt, but look on places like r/StableDiffusion where people share their workflows, it's not really much different than EDM production, they're not actually playing the instruments but organizing them together into a cohesive pipeline. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | Brian_K_White 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can't drop ship creativity and still take credit for it. Grubhub is also a tool. If you order a pizza, you didn't make a pizza "just using a different tool" |
|
| ▲ | DrewADesign 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Nope. At best, they are like commissioning work from a computer. When you commission a piece, especially as an art director, you often have lengthy conversations, exchange sketches, do multiple iterations, and have pretty fine-grained control over much of the final outcome. Art direction is a fundamentally creative process. But an art director would never, ever take credit for the piece. Why? They understand that so much of that artist’s voice, granular artistic perspective, and so much more are the building blocks of the piece. Image generators could provide reference material, make images for mood boards, and all sorts of other things useful in the artistic process, but the prompter is absolutely not making art. |
