| ▲ | Rohansi 10 hours ago | |||||||
> Which means that ongoing improvements don't actually buy you much of anything, because having to handle an exception every 50 miles isn't a better experience than having to handle one very 5 miles. That's what I thought too but after trying FSD on HW4 for two months I really think they are almost there. HW3 was really bad but I didn't need to intervene once with HW4. I think their biggest hurdle will be more of a legal or insurance one when they need to shift liability to actually stop saying it needs supervision. > the answers are Waymo, Apollo Go Both of which are supervised too, but remotely, and not constantly. There's no reason why Tesla can't do the same - they probably do for Robotaxis now - as soon as the exception rate is low enough, why not? | ||||||||
| ▲ | __m 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
If it is so good why don't they take liability? They aren't even willing to risk money while you are ready to risk your life... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | fragmede 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
comma.ai is the one that's available now to cars today. | ||||||||
| ||||||||