Or the 1990s Beanie Babies.

Or hell, 2 years ago with "those fucking apes", aka NFTs.

Or, the Meta-Verse. Yeah, that really took.... Off.

Quite a few of the usual suspects are involved in Crypto, NFT’s, “Metaverse”, and now AI. You’d think people would figure it out, but there’s the old Upton Sinclair quote I guess.

▲

jiggawatts 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Tulips, NFTs, and the Metaverse all revolved around exclusivity and collectibles. Art with no real utilitarian value.

I pay OpenAI $100/mo, twice what I pay for my mobile phone service.

It’s a useful service that I use every day.

I have never even heard of anyone in my social circle expressing even a mild interest in tulips, NFTs, or the metaverse.

This bubble has much more in common with the rail road boom and the 2000 fibre build out bubble.

▲

gcgbarbosa 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How did metaverse revolved around exclusivity or collectibles?

▲

simonjgreen 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

the metaverse went from being about owning your identity and digital possessions to mostly being about buying jpegs. once collectibles and nft speculation became the headline, it was hard to explain why any of the underlying technology mattered. after that, most people just associated the whole thing with speculation rather than the original vision.

which is a shame, I still feel like VR is full of untapped potential

	▲	m4rtink 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah - they not just VRChat but many other VR projects are alive and very active, doing verz innovative and almost marvelous things most people don't know anything about. It might not be a mainstream thing any time soon or ever, but that is not necessary as long as the people invovled woth VR are having fun. :)

▲

jiggawatts 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A big part of the metaverse was "buying land" in exclusive locations, a similar concept to NFTs or crypto in general.

▲

GolfPopper 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You start with "real utilitarian value" and your example is... how much you pay for it. That sounds more like a drug habit.

	▲	chung8123 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		How much you spend on something does have an indication on what the utility is for you. Though people spent on all the other hype things so at the time those things also had some utility for that user.
	▲	quietbritishjim 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I think their point is that is pretty cheap for such a useful service. The opposite of a bubble price.