| ▲ | dijit 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> No, I'm sorry but who on earth installs random software from random strangers, without a single step of validating before giving it access to (presumably) the same computer you do banking on? That would be every day that I run apt-get, pkg add, brew install, or download a random .exe/.dmg to update my machine. A decade of telling people that if they don't update constantly they're at risk, also affects us computer people. Being able (and willing) to inspect source tree is the exception here, not the standard. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> That would be every day that I run apt-get, pkg add, brew install, or download a random .exe/.dmg to update my machine. Everything except that last part, are not "random strangers on the internet", those are maintainers who maintain the registry/repository you've chosen to use. And when you use those, they use "mirrors" hosted on their own infrastructure. AUR is a very different thing from this, where essentially anyone, at any time, can become a "mirror" and host whatever code they want, with zero review. I obviously don't review stuff when I use pacman and official Arch package repositories, because again, those aren't "Wild west of random binaries", like the AUR. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||