It depends on your definition. For me it would have to be able to do the stuff humans can do like make a cup of coffee (Wozniak test).

Just maths isn't really general enough for the G in AGI.

▲

petilon a day ago | parent [-]

It can give you detailed instructions for making a coffee. Is that not enough? Actually making coffee requires more than intelligence, it requires eyes and limbs (i.e., robotics). Think about a human that is blind and does not have limbs. Does he not have natural general intelligence, even though he is not able to make a cup of coffee?

▲

tim333 a day ago | parent [-]

The Wozniak test has it with a robot body going into a house, finding a coffee maker and making a cup. I guess you can vary the rules as you like.

	▲	petilon a day ago \| parent [-]
		That's a good test for a robot, not for AGI. AGI should test only intelligence and should not require limbs.