| ▲ | glouwbug 2 days ago | |
It's a unary operator, kind of like ~ or !, which can apply to parenthesis (), until it meets a type, then the parenthesis are mandatory:
It's a weird double rule to parse, but even worse, the strongest binding precedence typically doesn't like an alpha identifier at that point in the recursive descent, so you get weird rules like:
Something like @ would've been a good pick for sizeof.\ramble on (actually, better yet, it should've been used instead of & for taking the address). Imagine:
\ramble off | ||
| ▲ | atiedebee 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Ive actually toyed with the idea of having @ as a pointer dereference. It seems to make sense: you want to know what is at the address stored in p. | ||
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||