| ▲ | codemonkey-zeta a day ago | |
I'm glad to see the first thing you mentioned was the value of purchasing software. For some reason software developers are particularly averse to paying for software, even when it pays for itself. My current company spent over $10k + at least a month of developer salary building an OKR app for the company, so probably in total $25k. One look at the SaaS landscape there would have revealed plenty of $5/mo/seat solutions that would take DECADES to break even with the investment we already made. To add insult to injury, the app was vibe-coded and barely works. In my experience, software that wants to help you is cheap. Software that wants to _trap_ you (Salesforce, Oracle, the Cloud) is expensive, and any software you write yourself falls into the latter category by default (you own it, you maintain it). | ||
| ▲ | Nextgrid a day ago | parent [-] | |
Dealing with SaaS doesn't just mean accounting for the subscription cost of the software. There's also the fact that said software can change its terms, pricing or functionality at any time (or disappear entirely) - often a time most inconvenient for your business. In contrast, your own solution can be built and maintained at your own schedule and the only changes will be those you decide. | ||