I've used a lot of tailwind professionally over the last few years and I agree with this article - it is spot on.

I never even use tailwind in my own stuff, even though I think that small devoper-led side-projects are where it is a good fit (and the reason for it's popularity).

I have the opposite experience regarding where it’s useful. In large teams , using an atomic css framework provides good guard rails and predictable behavior. I can confidently copy a marketing page or some random thing on the other side of the company and with very minimal tweaking, it will probably work. With normal CSS, the cascade is much more likely to cause subtle shifts in behavior over time as the main stylesheet is extended and modified.

To be clear, I like css and I find the cascade a great tool, but I also have first hand experienced the pain of too many chefs in the frontend styling kitchen and the havoc that seemingly innocent tweaks here or there can wreak on a site and I prefer tailwind for that reason.