The article’s length planning and argumentative process are too bad to feel like AI slop.

It's human slop.

▲ nchmy 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Warms the heart to see it

	▲	defrost 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The punchline is that it's version 2.0 after some years of turning over in the back of the authors head: `Years ago I published a part of this text in an essay. I was never happy with the original (artistically speaking) so I cannibalised parts for this new essay and memory-holed the original.`