Yeah I think they at least put some light effort into making it readable though. Obviously slop but not quite as bad as most slop articles.

There is barely any effort, a simple GPT5.6 sol pro query rips the post apart.

if you did that in the web interface, could you share the chat? I'd be interested to read it.

thanks for sharing.

When I read your original comment, I was thinking you had just asked it to evaluate the article. (Like just "evaluate this article" or something.)

I don't think anything anyone (or any AI) has ever written or published (including Sol itself) wouldn't be torn apart by the prompt you gave though.

	▲	inferencecoder 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I think it's fair to expect an extensive review of an article before publishing. Not everything has a set of serious flaws.