Remix.run Logo
sidewndr46 2 hours ago

Couldn't folks just use TLS 1.3?

bawolff 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

They can and they should, but the world is not a perfect place, so backwards compatibility is neccessary.

So long as TLS 1.2 can still be used securely, its really not a big deal.

mjevans an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the entire point is so that many with devices that will never see updates can still continue to use those devices.

ImPostingOnHN an hour ago | parent [-]

what stops folks from continuing to use them as-is, aside from this threat to break TLS 1.2 for them?

if a service runs TLS 1.2, and a client runs TLS 1.2, and they can talk to each other right now, why change the language?

if you released a thing, and people are choosing not to use it, is the right move really to enshittify their current choice to force them off it?

0ckpuppet 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

These prescriptions apply only to (D)TLS 1.2, since (D)TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 are deprecated by RFC 8996 and (D)TLS 1.3 either does not use the affected algorithms or does not share the relevant configuration options. (There is no DTLS version 1.1.)

ImPostingOnHN 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

better to break tons of existing installations and require confusing, arcane config file modifications just for folks to get things back to where they were before being broken