I don't know why the framing. This is easy: review the cases. If it has his hand it's tainted one way or the other. That's it.

▲

alpinisme 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How is it tainted by that alone? It’s almost certain that at least some of the patients he amputated actually needed amputation.

▲

matheusmoreira 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It doesn't automatically condemn him but it will probably trigger some kind of independent review of his cases. Better hope it's a perfect record.

	▲	alpinisme 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah if the comment just meant a review is warranted, great. But it’s not like separating personal desire and professional responsibility isn’t a routine part of just about every career. (Not saying this is equivalent to saying “that shirt looks great on you” when as a retail worker you think a customer looks ridiculous; but the analogy isn’t so far off that we should be shocked anyone would manage to have the fetish and still be a caring professional).

▲

bahmboo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They go into that. Basically the institution investigated themselves and found nothing wrong. Surprise. Patients have a different view and have an attorney.

▲

tomasphan 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Could ask this about most news stories these days. They are so bold as to not even hide the opinionated framing anymore.