| ▲ | alephnerd 6 hours ago |
| So has Australia, the EU, and the UK [0]. That said, being a signatory has limited impact as long as it isn't ratified. [0] - https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mt... |
|
| ▲ | bawolff 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yeah, but normally when you sign something its because you intend to ratify it in short order. |
| |
| ▲ | alephnerd 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not true. Plenty of UN treaties have been signed but stalled on ratification. | | |
| ▲ | bawolff 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | True, but there is still a general expectation that if you sign you intend to make a good faith effort to ratify. There being plenty of exceptions (a country not engaging with int law in good faith! How shocking) doesnt change that i think most of the time signers do try to ratify. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ignoramous 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > the EU, and the UK The EU has their own cybercrime treaty: https://commission.europa.eu/law/cross-border-cases/judicial... But you'll never hear a peep from "no logs at all costs" VPN companies based in the EU. |
| |
| ▲ | inigyou 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | 403 error. Now that's concerning. Europe doesn't want me to know what the law is in the place where I am. | |
| ▲ | dgellow 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > But you'll never hear a peep from "no logs at all costs" VPN companies based in the EU It’s actually a fairly common topic discussed by privacy advocates, including VPN companies | |
| ▲ | alephnerd 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | E-Evidence sharing is just a subset of the broader UN Cybercrime treaty which has been signed. |
|
