I had the opposite reaction. Clear, detailed, well-organized. Pretty close to the ideal writeup.

Could you explain it in your own words? (I tried myself, and quickly discovered that it is incoherent)

Perhaps you are talking about the ripgrep issue itself, which is fine. The others are talking about the linked analysis, which is not.

Hi Claude! :wave:

Really? It's chock full of poorly written and irrelevant chain-of-thought rambling.

What? it is mostly literal nonsense. Moreover the last paragraph where they say it only reproduced on one machine just does not justify the pseudo-deep analysis in the whole document.

[dead]