A half-hearted and timid post. It’s very obvious it was written to avoid criticism.

I think the author started writing this on a whim and couldnt bring it to a proper conclusion. What i cant understand is how it managed to get such a high points on hn. Because the piece is completely stale—neither praise nor criticism. The author’s own thoughts are so generic that we hear them every single day in our daily lives, and especially on Hacker News, in the back-and-forth between the “Coddites” and the “Vibers” crowd.

My indirect take is that, since AI coding is already shrouded in uncertainty, there’s no need for it to remain in this kind of fog—this article will lose all relevance within five years and end up proving the author wrong.