| ▲ | inigyou 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That isn't a NAS, then. It's a home server. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jasode 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
>That isn't a NAS, then. It's a home server. It's just 2 different usages of "NAS" for different contexts. In a business/enterprise environment, "NAS" is a more constrained definition of a single-purpose rack that only does storage duties. However, in a home environment, "NAS" is a fuzzier definition to also include running "apps" like Home Assistant, Plex/Jellyfish media, or webcam video analysis. Either in containers or vms. Both the vendors Synology/QNAP/UGREEN and the consumers use "NAS" in this looser definition. If you go out on Google search or Amazon to search for a "home server" to buy, you will get "NAS appliances" as the results. This happens because a NAS in a home usage has plenty of idle CPU leftover to run extra apps that's not strictly just storage. Buying a 2nd computer to run apps just to satisfy the NAS to remain as a "pure" NAS is a waste of money. Similar situation to "routers". Business/enterprise routers are single purpose. But home routers from the ISP are fuzzier definitions. They also include a DHCP service, a firewall, and a Wi-Fi access point. Maybe the home versions are not "true pure routers" in the official OSI 7-layer sense. Ok, but home users still call them "routers". | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | close04 4 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exactly! But we call it a NAS like we call the general purpose computer in our pockets a “phone”. There is no market for single purpose, exclusively NAS devices outside of enterprise. | |||||||||||||||||||||||