| ▲ | imilev 4 hours ago | |
I disagree tbh, the prototype is not the product not just because of technical abilities but also because of product expertese in a topic. If it was otherwise outsourcing companies would've dominated the market for a long time, but it is with the exp from clients and many users that you get to build a great product. It takes a lot of time to understand what is the pain of the user, in many cases we know what the problem is but we have not time to think of a good solution to it. | ||
| ▲ | jdw64 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I agree with the point that a prototype is not technology, but the problem is that the argument limits gen AI code to just prototyping. I also think prototyping and production are different, but the boundary between what is a prototype and what is production is actually quite blurry. That's not the core issue, though. The market itself is demanding heavy AI use, and GitHub has already reported a massive increase in repository creation. In other words, if we acknowledge that there are clearly users who want this GEN AI code, then we should be having a discussion about how to actually push that code into production | ||