| ▲ | sokoloff a day ago | |
Why do you think it will be low cost operation rather than highly paid specialized talent (but only very few of them)? If AI becomes a widespread job displacer, I think we’re going to see an amplification of the value of talent. If you think there’s 2x or 10x talent now, you might find there’s 10x or 50x talent with AI. | ||
| ▲ | nullorempty a day ago | parent [-] | |
I think it's reasonable to expect amplification but I am not sure how reasonable it would be to expect sustainable amplification. I feel that AI removes the meaning from work and with that gone we eventually start loosing the talent. And 0 talent by 10 ( or even 50 ) is a fucking 0! | ||